Shadowrun Online: when being second hurts

As I write this, Shadowrun Online has a little under three days to go before its Kickstarter-based funding drive ends, and it’s not looking good for Cliffhanger Productions. They’re about two thirds of the way to their goal; although the pledges have really ramped up in the last week, it may not be enough to get across the line.

Shadowrun Online backer banner

Shadowrun Online is, of course, based on the popular and long-lived pen-and-paper RPG Shadowrun, which has had a complicated history. First developed by Jordan Weisman at FASA Corporation (and one of FASA’s two big successes, along with Battletech), Shadowrun was licensed to Fantasy Productions when FASA closed its doors. FanPro lost the license to Catalyst Game Labs a few years later, who hold it now. Mind you, the electronic rights (that is, video games) were first spun off along with all the other FASA intellectual properties to FASA Interactive, which was then sold to Microsoft, who then produced the much-hated Shadowrun FPS. In the wake of that, Microsoft closed FASA Interactive and licensed the electronic rights to Smith and Tinker, a new company established by Jordan Weisman. (I feel I should intone “the circle is now complete”, Darth Vader-style, at this point.)

Now, I have a long-standing love affair with Shadowrun; it was the first game I wrote for professionally, back in its Third Edition era, and I’ve been playing it since University. It’s by far my favourite RPG. So seeing the Kickstarter struggling is sad, for me.

Unfortunately, it’s got a few points counting against it.

First of all, a high-profile Kickstarter for a Shadowrun video game exploded across Shadowrun fandom just a few months ago. That was back in April for Shadowrun Returns, a single-player 2D turn-based RPG from Jordan Weisman’s new company, and it did amazingly well. Over 36,000 backers, and they made over four times their funding goal – they asked for $400,000 and got $1.8 million. By comparison, Shadowrun Online has 3,800 backers and has scored (so far) about $330,000 of its $500,000 goal. It’s hard not to suspect that Shadowrun Returns has already leached out a lot of the money and enthusiasm for Shadowrun video games. (Certainly the Shadowrun fans I know are talking about SRO a lot less than they promoted Shadowrun Returns.)

Then there’s the simple fact that MMO gamers – although it feels like we’re everywhere, thanks to WoW’s phenomenal success – are only a fraction of the gaming market. There are a lot of gamers out there who don’t particularly like MMOs, and don’t want to play them. Most MMO players enjoy single-player games as well; the reverse is often not true.

Next there’s the confusion over Shadowrun Online’s subscription model. Originally the Kickstarter launched as a full free-to-play game, which of course necessitates reliance on microtransactions for funding. There was plenty of unhappiness around this, and Cliffhanger’s people put their heads together and came up with an alternative: they’d also offer a “Campaign” model, where you buy the game up-front and then pay nothing for gameplay, Guild Wars style. So as not to invalidate the pre-Campaign model pledges, they’ll be offering different servers for different game types. It’s actually fairly straightforward, and kudos to Cliffhanger for being responsive to their fans, but I suspect the sudden change created unnecessary confusion, which puts people off committing their cash.

And then there’s the setting differences. Shadowrun Online is set in the game’s “present”, in the 2070s; Shadowrun Returns is set in 2050, the setting of the earliest editions of the pen-and-paper game. That’s a huge nostalgia trip right there for long-time fans, and there’s a lot of nostalgia in the Shadowrun fanbase. The current edition of Shadowrun, 4th Edition, shook up the world and changed the playing field when it was released. 1 Although 4th Edition has done very well commercially, and was critically acclaimed, there’s a significant proportion of the fanbase who’d love an opportunity to run around in the 2050s again, and SRO just doesn’t cater to that the way Shadowrun Returns did.

Whether it’s one of these factors, or more likely a mixture of all of them, it looks like this is more of a handicap than SRO can overcome. And that’s a great shame; although I have my doubts about how well Shadowrun would fit a themepark MMO model, I’d love the chance to be proved wrong.

  1. For a sense of the magnitude of these changes, think of the Shattering in WoW’s recent Cataclysm expansion

Tags: , , ,

6 Responses to “Shadowrun Online: when being second hurts”

  1. August 15, 2012 at 09:09 #

    I supported it, and I’m glad that it’s not across the line, but I’m not looking forward to it anywhere near as much as SR:Returns.

    My initial concern was around the f2p element, but they handled that VERY well, and completely turned me around.

    The other aspect though is that it’s an MMO. By virtue of being a shared world, MMOs that are dependant on pre-written content ultimately stop you from being able to impact that world in a meaningful way. Either I can’t kill the corp CEO or my killing him is just reset the next time someone else gets the same mission. (As an aside, that’s the reason I didn’t bother with Star Wars Old Republic even before the f2p decision was made). Yes, I can get past those limitations, but ultimately, I prefer a single player experience where the limitations simply aren’t present, and a story can unfold properly.

    It’s possible to do games like EVE where the content is dependant on other players rather than pre-written content, but that was never going to be applicable to a Shadowrun game

    • August 15, 2012 at 09:36 #

      Yeah, I have some concerns about Shadowrun’s viability as an MMO. I don’t have the same issues with MMOs in general that you do — obviously! — but I’ve never particularly thought Shadowrun would make a good one.

      To me, the joy of Shadowrun is its open-endedness. As an example: the J gives you a job; assuming you accept, and successfully execute the job, you can turn around and give the results to the J, or sell them back to the corp you took them from, or both, or auction them off to the highest bidder, or sell them to the papers, or whatever. It’s not just a foregone conclusion that you do what The Man tells you; that’s kind of the point. And I’m not sure how they’re going to render that down to a mission-based MMO without removing all that possibility.

      This may, of course, just be a case of me knowing and loving the original IP too well to appreciate a game based on just one aspect of it.

      • August 15, 2012 at 09:40 #

        I don’t think they will render it down properly. You will lose those elements, and end up with the basic concept, without the extra flexibility. But, even then, it’s Shadowrun, and because it’s multiplayer, it’s Shadowrun with friends, so it’ll still get a bit of love from me :)

  2. rori
    August 16, 2012 at 08:22 #

    And it funded with 1 day to go.

    Not sure how they pulled it off. Cliffhanger games really living up to the name.

    May 2013 seems a bit optimistic to me, but I’m really quite stoked that its going to see the light of day. (hopefully… you know how these things get pooched. dealing with dragons and the like ;)

    Hope you both got a SQUEE when you heard.


  1. What makes a good MMO setting? – Siha Games! - August 23, 2012

    […] recent Shadowrun Online kickstarter prompted a bit of thought on my part, as — unlike to most Shadowrun fans — I’d […]

  2. Mechwarrior Online: the good, the bad and the ugly – Siha Games! - October 5, 2012

    […] a rich story background as a tabletop miniatures game originally developed by FASA Corporation with the same development and licensing history as Shadowrun1, but at this stage in MWO’s development that background setting is almost entirely […]

Leave a Reply